Bytelearn - cat image with glassesAI tutor

Welcome to Bytelearn!

Let’s check out your problem:

Steven found that between 2012 and 2020 , as a country's per capita chicken egg consumption increased, the country's divorce rate decreased. Based on this information, which of the following conclusions is valid?
Choose 1 answer:
(A) Eating chicken eggs prevents divorces.
(B) Divorces lead to a decrease in per capita chicken egg consumption.
(C) There is a positive association between per capita chicken egg consumption and divorce rate.
(D) There is a negative association between per capita chicken egg consumption and divorce rate.

Steven found that between 20122012 and 20202020 , as a country's per capita chicken egg consumption increased, the country's divorce rate decreased. Based on this information, which of the following conclusions is valid?\newlineChoose 11 answer:\newline(A) Eating chicken eggs prevents divorces.\newline(B) Divorces lead to a decrease in per capita chicken egg consumption.\newline(C) There is a positive association between per capita chicken egg consumption and divorce rate.\newline(D) There is a negative association between per capita chicken egg consumption and divorce rate.

Full solution

Q. Steven found that between 20122012 and 20202020 , as a country's per capita chicken egg consumption increased, the country's divorce rate decreased. Based on this information, which of the following conclusions is valid?\newlineChoose 11 answer:\newline(A) Eating chicken eggs prevents divorces.\newline(B) Divorces lead to a decrease in per capita chicken egg consumption.\newline(C) There is a positive association between per capita chicken egg consumption and divorce rate.\newline(D) There is a negative association between per capita chicken egg consumption and divorce rate.
  1. Understand Prompt: The question prompt is asking us to determine the correct conclusion based on the observed relationship between per capita chicken egg consumption and divorce rate.
  2. Identify Relationship: We need to understand the meaning of the observed relationship. An increase in per capita chicken egg consumption is associated with a decrease in the divorce rate.
  3. Avoid Confusion: We must be careful not to confuse correlation with causation. Just because two trends are observed together does not mean that one causes the other.
  4. Option (A): Option (A) suggests that eating chicken eggs prevents divorces. This is a causation statement that cannot be concluded from the given information, which only shows an association.
  5. Option (B): Option (B) suggests that divorces lead to a decrease in per capita chicken egg consumption. This is also a causation statement and is the opposite of the observed trend.
  6. Option (C): Option (C) suggests there is a positive association between per capita chicken egg consumption and divorce rate. However, a positive association would mean that as one increases, the other also increases, which is not the case here.
  7. Option (D): Option (D) suggests there is a negative association between per capita chicken egg consumption and divorce rate. This means that as one increases, the other decreases, which matches the observed trend.

More problems from Prime factorization