Q. -- searchonmath.com(3)Prove that 3 is irrational
Assume 3 rational: Assume 3 is rational, meaning it can be expressed as a fraction ba, where a and b are integers with no common factors other than 1, and b is not zero.
Equation derivation: Then 3=ba implies that 3=b2a2.
Substitute a=3k: Multiplying both sides by b2 gives us 3b2=a2.
Simplify equation: This means that a2 is divisible by 3, so a must also be divisible by 3.
Contradiction reached: Let a=3k, where k is an integer. Substituting back into the equation gives us 3b2=(3k)2.
Contradiction reached: Let a=3k, where k is an integer. Substituting back into the equation gives us 3b2=(3k)2. Simplifying the right side, we get 3b2=9k2.
Contradiction reached: Let a=3k, where k is an integer. Substituting back into the equation gives us 3b2=(3k)2. Simplifying the right side, we get 3b2=9k2. Dividing both sides by 3 gives us b2=3k2.
Contradiction reached: Let a=3k, where k is an integer. Substituting back into the equation gives us 3b2=(3k)2. Simplifying the right side, we get 3b2=9k2. Dividing both sides by 3 gives us b2=3k2. This implies that b2 is also divisible by 3, and hence b is divisible by 3.
Contradiction reached: Let a=3k, where k is an integer. Substituting back into the equation gives us 3b2=(3k)2. Simplifying the right side, we get 3b2=9k2. Dividing both sides by 3 gives us b2=3k2. This implies that b2 is also divisible by 3, and hence b is divisible by 3. But if both k0 and b are divisible by 3, this contradicts our initial assumption that k3 is in its lowest terms, since 3 is a common factor.
Contradiction reached: Let a=3k, where k is an integer. Substituting back into the equation gives us 3b2=(3k)2. Simplifying the right side, we get 3b2=9k2. Dividing both sides by 3 gives us b2=3k2. This implies that b2 is also divisible by 3, and hence b is divisible by 3. But if both k0 and b are divisible by 3, this contradicts our initial assumption that k3 is in its lowest terms, since 3 is a common factor. Therefore, our initial assumption that k5 is rational is incorrect, and k5 must be irrational.